Atlas Shirked - Time for US to Take Over

In Ayn Rand's book, Atlas Shrugged, we are introduced to a world that is not sufficiently appreciative of the capitalists that rule it and who control access to the goods and services upon which civilized society depends. The ingrate proletariat mob begins to insist on a larger share of the wealth created on their backs, to which the courageous captains of industry respond by getting indignant and conspiring to jet off to a secret compound in the Rockies, leaving the ignorant masses to starve in the dark until they come to their senses and realize the true value of their overlords.

 Atlas Shirked

Today, we see a similar dynamic playing out as billionaires buy our government outright and turn a blind eye to climate change, pollution, corporate fraud and theft, healthcare malfeasance by insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and practitioners, and the military industrial complex bombing poor brown people already suffering from repressive regimes and living in a desert.

 They must believe that their money will be able to buy them clean air and drinkable water even though their means of making money poisons the world's supply of both.  All the while climates suitable for growing food continue to shift and shrink.  Or maybe they hope to buy a ticket on a spaceship to an as yet undiscovered world.  Certainly, they'll at least need to buy more security as the conditions their greed creates cause billions to resort to desperate measures to feed their families. 

A normal person with an ounce of human empathy would not persist in this violent despoilment of Earth's resources carried out by the one percent.  Even a wholly self-centered person would realize that the planet they are ruining is the only one they can possibly live on. It's like sawing through the branch you're sitting on. The people ruling the world must be sociopaths/psychopaths.

 An article on LiveScience.com stated, "Psychopaths make up about 1 percent of the general population and as much as 25 percent of male offenders in federal correctional settings, according to the researchers. Psychopaths are typically profoundly selfish and lack emotion.One percent you say? Hmmm.

The US population is about 321 million, meaning we likely have 3.2 million psychopaths among us. If psychopaths make up 25 percent of incarcerated felons, I would venture a guess that they make up about 90 percent of elected senators, representatives, lobbyists, CEOs and other assorted men occupying the highest places in our country. It's no secret that the oval office is 100 percent occupied by such an emotionally lacking person. Look at the Hare Psychopathy Checklist and see how many boxes our dear leader checks off.

I don't generally condone extreme speech, or violent behavior, but when our whole civilization is at risk, I think no measure too extreme to protect society from psychologically/emotionally defective predators. If a psychopath broke into a family home with the intent to do harm, the world would judge the householder justified in shooting him to protect his and his family's lives. We have a tremendous host of psychopathic greed monkeys pulling the levers of power in our government, and the number of lives at stake is no less than 7.5 BILLION!

 No, I'm not saying to kill them. That would be the same violent overreaction that is the source of so much destruction and suffering in the world now.  I am saying we need to make a concerted, focused effort to VOTE THEM OUT, based on a verifiable set of values.

 Sadly, there is no political party affiliation that can be used as a predictor, or indicator of psychopathic behavior. Both parties take money in exchange for voting in favor of antisocial programs and policies. I would say that at least Democrats SPEAK as though they care about their fellow human beings, but vague concepts like hope and change are no deeds.  I give President Obama credit for pulling a "Sully Sullenberger" and getting the nose up on the plane at the last minute when he took the yoke, but in terms of fundamentally changing the nature of the people's relationship to their government for the people's betterment, nothing much was changed. Obamacare fell way short of what is needed, but at least when the GOP tried to take even that meager crumb away from the citizenry, it exposed the politicians as nothing more than corporate tools. 

 We need to support ONLY politicians that explicitly support FDR's "Second Bill of Rights" which was:

    The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
    The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
    The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
    The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
    The right of every family to a decent home;
    The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
    The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
    The right to a good education.

 ANY politician that can't wholeheartedly and unapologetically get behind, and vote for, policies and programs that promote these simple aims of good government, should be voted out of office at the earliest opportunity. If Atlas isn't going to do his job of supporting the world I say we give him the boot, and take a turn at supporting it as a collective of caring and compassionate citizens.

 I read an excellent description of our ruling elite in the book Buddhism Without Beliefs by Stephen Batchelor.

The gist of the idea is we are confusing alienated self-centeredness for individual liberty. When you examine the choices our representatives make in how to allocate money and whose rights to protect, you can see they have a great deal of fear for anything alien to their narrow, self-interested, worldview. They spend a grotesque amount of the budget on the military, law enforcement, the penal system and surveillance to ensure threats are discovered and met early (maybe when they're still only thoughts in someone's head) and controlled with violence.

 In short, we have people making decisions for ALL of us who see themselves at war with the potential threats outside their skins, and are motivated by greed that even a billion dollars wouldn't quench. The most amazing thing of all is, rather than being publicly executed for crimes against humanity, they find a way to be extremely well paid to make the worst possible decisions and maybe even end the lives of everyone on Earth. I suppose assassins are well paid for a similar reason - most people wouldn't violate their moral code against harming, even killing, people for money.

 No, we don't need to "have a frank discussion" or "adhere to our core values" or "do a better job communicating our message." We need to put up FDR's Second Bill of Rights as the standard by which policies and laws are judged, and EVERY elected official that wavers the slightest bit from that spirit needs to be voted out instantly.

 If a guy like Grover Nordquist, who fantasized about making government so small it could be drowned in a bathtub (how psychotic is that mental picture?), can threaten almost the entire congress to take a pledge not to raise taxes, surely 100 million of us can make an even more ominous threat. We tried Occupy Wall Street and they just looked down from the high rises and thought, "Look, the peasants are revolting. Damn hippies."  No longer can the self-appointed "Masters of the Universe" get indignant if boycotts, vandalism and sabotage are directed at them because they ignored the voices of peaceful protestors.

 Let us rise up and take back government of the people, by the people and for the people and help the "captains of industry" onto their jets and off to whatever secret billionaire enclave they may have. We have a society we're trying to build here.

Continue reading
121 Hits

Tiny Houses, Big Hearts and Hope for the Homeless

There are two projects I've discovered  that make me feel proud of what we can do as human beings when motivated by love and compassion. One is Quixote Village in Olympia Washington and the other is Mobile Loaves and Fishes in Austin, TX, in general, but specifically their Community First! program.

 Community First

Quixote Village

I wanted to share these two links right at the outset so you can learn more about the great things people are doing to help poor and homeless people, rather learning on the news about how our politicians and business leaders are conspiring to rob working people, take away the most basic social safety nets, and destroy financial and environmental protections in the name of greed.

These stories are about the opposite - people more concerned with taking action to help the least powerful in society with a hand up, than helping themselves with both hands. I feel my faith in humanity restored just knowing there are people in the world who choose to work in service of the poor and powerless, without seeking any personal benefit, other than the satisfaction of being of service to those in need. Sometimes human beings are truly beautiful and noble creatures.

I met Bill Arensmeyer in Jarell Cove State park outside Shelton, WA, where he and his wife, Sherrel, were working as camp hosts in April 2017. Little did I know that he was a driving force behind the formation of Quixote Village in Olympia, WA, a tiny house community designed to serve the homeless. I had learned of Quixote Village  prior to leaving my home in Texas on a quixotic mission of my own, so it was quite the coincidence that I happened to strike up a friendship with the guy who was instrumental in its formation at the very beginning. Sometimes the Universe smiles on a seeker.

Here is the story:

In 1992, Bill Arensmeyer was working as an associate minister with the Unitarian Universalist Church in Olympia, WA. He had set up a food bank program that supplemented the non-perishable canned and dry goods of the existing food bank with fresh produce and other perishables from generous local grocers. This program was delivering about $260,000 worth of food a a year to area recipients.  Bill was involved in this program for about 14 years.

In 1993, he got a call about a family living in a chicken coop with two sick kids. Bill drove out to check up on them and discovered the boys both had pneumonia, so he loaded up the family of four and took the kids to a doctor for treatment and then took them to the church parsonage which was vacant at the time. In the days to come Bill connected the family with the Family Support Center in Olympia where they found more permanent housing. In a few days, the Family Support Center called saying they had two more families needing temporary shelter and could they perhaps use the parsonage as well? Not one to say no to people in need, these families were also accommodated and a new chapter was begun - Out of the Woods, a shelter for single women and women with children was set up in the 5 bedroom, 2 bath parsonage.

As word spread of this new shelter, the population swelled. Bill got the county jail to provide some surplus sleeping mats and there were up to 50 people under roof some nights. To their credit, the city official in Olympia were willing to allow a bit of latitude on certain city occupancy codes in light of the humanitarian nature of the mission, but it was necessary to install a fire suppression sprinkler system and other facilities to accommodate the increased population.

Fast forward to 2007. A city ordinance in Olympia made it illegal for people to sit or lay on the sidewalk which caused a group of indigent people to assemble in protest in a tent city in a downtown parking lot.  A standoff was developing between the police and the tent city dwellers when Bill offered a solution - set up the tents on church grounds as a sort of sanctuary. This worked in the short term, but city officials decided that this tent city could only occupy a specific site for 90 to 120 days.

Undaunted, Bill contacted other area churches and got some of them to agree to serve as host for the traveling tent city. Camp Quixote was born.Contrary to what one might expect, the effect of having this tent community in the host communities was positive, both in terms of reduced trash and litter (residents were encouraged to pick up trash in host neighborhoods as a sort of "payment" in consideration of allowing them to stay), and in terms of crime. Any solo transients in the area were greeted by camp members and advised that any crime or vandalism they might commit would not be looked on favorably by the group and I suppose there was an implied threat of repercussions.  Eventually, even the chief of police volunteered to help pitch the benefits of hosting the tent village to neighborhood committees because he had seen firsthand the reduced crime rates.

Another interesting development was the addition of portable 8'x8' tiny houses. Each wall consisted of two 4'x8' sheets of plywood framed with 2x2 lumber drilled to be bolted together. A gable roof assembly, also of 4x8 sheets of plywood topped the structures and thus an 8x8 portable shelter that could sleep 2 comfortably was built for about $200 at the time. These were a great improvement over tents, especially in windy, rainy conditions so common in Thurston County Washington winters.

Eventually, people who value order and decorum asserted their wills to change the priorities of both the Out of the Woods women's shelter and Quixote Village tent city. The number of women and children housed under the roof at Out of The Woods was reduced, to "elevate the standard of living for those in its care" and it was resolved that instead of tents, a village of Tiny Houses should be built for the same reason.  Nobody could argue that more space is better, or a Tiny House is better than a tent, but the numbers of people helped went down drastically. Additionally, both places became "low threshold" facilities in which drinking and/or drug use was grounds for exile. Formerly, the policy was drinking or drugging on premises was forbidden, but being under the influence was not punished, unless it led to anti-social behaviors. Obviously, such policies reduced the numbers of people being helped. It might also be noted that a person with a drug or alcohol problem is not as likely to get into a recovery program if they're cast out on their own.

Two more spin-offs of Quixote Village are planned for Washington state. Called Tiny House Justice, they will both focus on homeless veterans. We can all agree that it's a disgrace the way our returning soldiers are treated. Plenty of time and effort goes into training them to kill and destroy - shouldn't at least an equal amount of attention be paid to helping them re-assimilate into society? 

A larger issue arises though - does one have to serve in the military to be worthy of a modicum of support in our nation? Community First has a great saying, "Goodness has a building code: Everyone sleeps inside." 

Anybody who believes it is in the interest of our nation's economic health, leaving out spiritual concerns entirely, to have people cast adrift to fend for themselves in a land of plenty, must be actively conjuring reasons why this is justified. Rather than setting our minds to the task of rationalizing why the sick and homeless deserve what they get, couldn't we turn our attention to figuring out ways to make such suffering unnecessary?

Continue reading
147 Hits

Where Hides Evil in My Kingdom?

  • I came across the fundamental tenets of the Satanic Temple the other day and I actually found them surprisingly reasonable:

 Satanic Temple Logo

There are seven fundamental tenets.

  • One should strive to act with compassion and empathy towards all creatures in accordance with reason.
  • The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.
  • One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.
  • The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo your own.
  • Beliefs should conform to our best scientific understanding of the world. We should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit our beliefs.
  • People are fallible. If we make a mistake, we should do our best to rectify it and resolve any harm that may have been caused.
  • Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word

I confess to finding the imagery of a Goat-Headed God disturbing, but the above tenets sound like ideas we need more of in the world.


Not many people are aware that the hebrew term "ha satan" means "the adversary" as in the prosecution in a court case. Conversely, the holy spirit, which the bible says Jesus sends to his followers is called a helper, comforter, advocate and counselor, which would be akin to a lawyer for the defense.


This is where I have a problem figuring out who is on which side.  Some vocal "Christians" want "religious freedom" laws that allow them to refuse service to people they deem "sinful", yet their Bible, that they want taught in schools to the exclusion of science, states unequivocally "Judge not." and "Forgive seventy times seven" and numerous other straightforward admonitions to be forgiving and tolerant, patient and long-suffering.


So if Jesus takes the side of helper, comforter and advocate for the sinner, and Satan is making accusations and pressing charges he hopes will get people eternal life in hell without parole, I'd say people that want to punish people who somehow fall short, in their estimation, are more like Satan than Jesus and could more accurately be described as Satanists than Christians.


We live in a bizarro world where up is down and black is white, and reason has gone into hiding for fear of being labeled a heretic or a traitor to the cause. If there was a real Satan, such a system of self-righteous zealots persecuting (and prosecuting) anyone who deviates slightly from the conformity the "good people" propound would be ideal.  This is why we lock people up and ruin their lives for smoking flowers and we have been known to chemically castrate homosexual males as recently as the 60s. If somebody is poor, unemployed, or homeless, or sick without insurance, they must have done some evil thing that required punishment. From pulpits across the land, pastors are encouraging their flocks to be on guard against sin and not to countenance sinners in their homes or places of business. The problem then is, the true sinner, and the only one you can effectively change, is in the mirror.


In the movie "Excalibur", Arthur asks Merlin, "Where hides evil in my kingdom, then?", to which Merlin replies, "Always... where you never expect it. Always."

Continue reading
103 Hits

A Path With Heart

GrailQuest Adventures – Seeking Paths with Heart


We hope to share stories here that inspire, encourage, or just showcase ways of living more self-sufficiently and sustainably.


gqfanimI will start things off by describing some of the rewarding experiences I've had so far, and some of the twists and turns unfolding on this adventure now. It is my hope that some of you kind readers out there will share some of your favorite anecdotes, experiences, quotes, ideas, etc. to help build a repository of positive messages for a world in need of faith, hope and courage.


The phrase "A path with heart" comes from the book by Carlos Castaneda,  The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui Way of Knowledge. Here is a relevant passage:


“Anything is one of a million paths. Therefore you must always keep in mind that a path is only a path; if you feel you should not follow it, you must not stay with it under any conditions. To have such clarity you must lead a disciplined life. Only then will you know that any path is only a path and there is no affront, to oneself or to others, in dropping it if that is what your heart tells you to do. But your decision to keep on the path or to leave it must be free of fear or ambition. I warn you. Look at every path closely and deliberately. Try it as many times as you think necessary.


This question is one that only a very old man asks. Does this path have a heart? All paths are the same: they lead nowhere. They are paths going through the bush, or into the bush. In my own life I could say I have traversed long long paths, but I am not anywhere. Does this path have a heart? If it does, the path is good; if it doesn't, it is of no use. Both paths lead nowhere; but one has a heart, the other doesn't. One makes for a joyful journey; as long as you follow it, you are one with it. The other will make you curse your life. One makes you strong; the other weakens you.


Before you embark on any path ask the question: Does this path have a heart? If the answer is no, you will know it, and then you must choose another path. The trouble is nobody asks the question; and when a man finally realizes that he has taken a path without a heart, the path is ready to kill him. At that point very few men can stop to deliberate, and leave the path. A path without a heart is never enjoyable. You have to work hard even to take it. On the other hand, a path with heart is easy; it does not make you work at liking it.


I have told you that to choose a path you must be free from fear and ambition. The desire to learn is not ambition. It is our lot as men to want to know. The path without a heart will turn against men and destroy them. It does not take much to die, and to seek death is to seek nothing."

- Carlos Castaneda, The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui Way of Knowledge


Continue reading
607 Hits
1 Comment

Bartlett's Familiar Quotations

Canon PowerShot Camera

Amazon Gift Cards

Amazon Prime